SCRANTON — The city improperly revoked a building contractor’s licenses without first giving him a hearing, a judge ruled in a lawsuit over the dispute.
In a pretrial summary judgment, federal Magistrate Judge Martin Carlson determined the city violated Theodore Brunelle’s procedural due process rights by not first giving him a hearing on the revocations.
In the same ruling, Carlson denied other summary judgments sought by Brunelle on claims the city violated his “substantive” due process rights and that the conduct amounted to policy making.Carlson issued his ruling
Aug. 3. On Aug. 24, U.S. District Judge Robert D. Mariani adopted the ruling. The lawsuit now continues toward an eventual trial.
The city intends to appeal the adverse pretrial ruling, said the city’s attorney in the case, Michael O’Brien of Clarks Summit.
Attempts to reach Brunelle and his attorney were unsuccessful.
Brunelle filed the federal lawsuit against Scranton’s Licensing, Inspections and Permits Department in 2015, alleging LIP Director Patrick Hinton violated Brunelle’s due process rights by revoking several contracting licenses without giving Brunelle a chance to challenge the decision. Hinton told Brunelle he could seek an appeal after the fact, in county court.
Brunelle contended that the city acknowledged no hearing was held and an appeals board was defunct at the time of the revocations.
The city argued the revocations were justified and done under a law allowing immediate action in an emergency, if an imminent threat to public safety exists. Brunelle’s situation fit that criteria, because he was cited repeatedly for violating construction codes, including doing shoddy repair work, performing work without getting required permits and allowing tenants to occupy condemned buildings, the city claimed.
Brunelle countered there was no emergency and the city was required to provide a hearing.
Carlson agreed on that point. His ruling recounted the strained relationship between the two sides.
“Here, it is apparent that the legal collision between these parties stem, in part, from mutual suspicions, suspicions which could perhaps have been addressed and reconciled through an orderly process,” Carlson’s ruling said. “Such procedural due process protection is particularly appropriate and apt when the state actors and private parties have utterly irreconcilable perspectives toward one another.”
Brunelle claimed he had no problems with the city until his brother, Alex Brunelle, a local property developer, sued the city in an unrelated matter. That’s when the city “attacked” Theodore Brunelle, the ruling recounted.
Reached by phone, Alex Brunelle declined to comment.
But Hinton had an entirely different viewpoint: that dealing with the Brunelles was “quite a daunting task ... because there was a constant manipulation game that was being played” by them, according to the ruling.
Much of Theodore’s work in Scranton was performed on behalf of Alex, but they often did not distinguish their roles as contractor and real estate entrepreneur. They frequently used the same mailing addresses and shared office space and support staff. Their “casual indifference” to the permitting process — often submitting permit applications under Theodore’s name but with Alex’s business identified as the contractor — frustrated city officials. They conflated the brothers in code enforcement matters, the ruling said.
Meanwhile, Hinton, who became LIP director in 2014, did not have any previous direct experience in the field. For more than a year into the job, Hinton was “unaware” of relevant information about licensing and revocation procedures, the ruling says.
It was against this backdrop that disputes ensued.
Regarding procedural due process, the city has since reconstituted the appeals board, O’Brien said.
“We think that when, and if, this matter proceeds to a jury trial, a jury would determine Mr. Hinton and all city officials acted responsibly, appropriately and in the best interests of the residents of the city of Scranton,” O’Brien said.
Contact the writer:
jlockwood@timesshamrock.com;
570-348-9100 x5185;
@jlockwoodTT on Twitter