An attorney for Keystone Sanitary Landfill told a visiting judge Monday in Lackawanna County Court that Friends of Lackawanna and its allies lack legal standing to challenge a Dunmore zoning decision supporting the landfill’s expansion.
Senior Judge Leonard N. Zito of Northampton County listened to about 50 minutes of arguments from both sides on a landfill motion to dismiss the grassroots organization’s appeal of a zoning board ruling that found the proposed expansion was in compliance with the borough zoning ordinance.
The judge gave no indication when he will issue a decision.
An expansion application pending before the state Department of Environmental Protection would, if approved, allow Keystone to continue operating for more than 40 years.
The controversial proposal received a boost in September 2015, when the zoning board concluded the landfill’s original plan to pile waste 165 feet higher than currently permitted would not violate a height restriction contained in the borough ordinance. The decision prompted an appeal by Friends of Lackawanna and six Dunmore residents.
In asking the court to dismiss the appeal, landfill attorney Marc D. Jonas noted the zoning board previously found Friends of Lackawanna and the individual residents would suffer no substantial, immediate or direct impact from the expansion and lacked standing to contest the proposal.
All of the residents live more than 3,100 feet from the proposed expansion area, and Friends of Lackawanna owns no real estate in the borough, he said.
Citing a series of Pennsylvania appellate court rulings in land-use cases, Jonas said opposition alone is not enough to produce standing, which requires both close proximity and a demonstration of harm.
A review of the testimony that expansion opponents provided to the borough zoning board would show “nothing more than objections to a legitimate land use,” he said.
“It’s got to be more than, ‘I’m opposed to this,’ or, ‘I don’t like that.’ ... They do not connect their concerns to harm,” the attorney told Zito.
Attorney Jordan Yeager, representing Friends of Lackawanna and the borough residents, argued the concept of “close proximity” is ill-defined in state law.
“I don’t think it is simply a matter of measuring feet,” he said.
Yeager told the judge the issue is whether people have a valid interest in what is happening in their neighborhood. To suggest that a borough resident who must see or smell the landfill does not have a property interest “throws the notion of property rights away,” he said.
In terms of standing, the court should look at how it all fits together, he said.
Jonas also argued the Friends of Lackawanna’s appeal should also be dismissed based on its length: 53 pages with 377 numbered paragraphs. That conflicts with a section of the state Municipalities Planning Code that requires the grounds for a land-use appeal to be set forth in a concise manner, he said.
The Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts appointed Zito to hear the landfill zoning challenge after members of the Lackawanna County bench recused themselves from the case.
Contact the writer: dsingleton@timesshamrock.com